An analysis of the topic of the british empire

Great Britain during Victoria's reign was not just a powerful island nation. It was the center of a global empire that fostered British contact with a wide variety of other cultures, though the exchange was usually an uneven one. By the end of the nineteenth century, nearly one-quarter of the earth's land surface was part of the British Empire, and more than million people were governed from Great Britain, however nominally. Queen Victoria's far-flung empire was a truly heterogenous entity, governed by heterogenous practices.

An analysis of the topic of the british empire

The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The Victorian Age: Topic 4: Overview

The British Empire is arguably the biggest empire in recent history of the world whereby Britain is positioned as the center and the colonies, including African nations, the American colony, Australia among others, forming the periphery. Each society has a center and there is a likelihood of being able to draw a distinction between the center and the periphery.

Ordinarily, the center exerts economic, political and cultural power over the periphery - which is the entire time dependent, has a tendency of being deficient of resources, and more often suffers from investment insufficiency.

A perfect illustration for this is the centrality of England in relation to its colonies such as Australia where Englishmen tended to be dominant compared to the aborigines who originally settled on the land. Notably, the concept of centers and periphery may be conveniently useful to the historical understanding of the colonial centers and their respective peripheries.

This paper is aimed at analyzing the center-periphery relationship of the British Empire.

The Conversation

The center at first relates to the periphery as the vital power though later when the periphery grows stronger a state of mutual relationship emerges.

In analyzing the center-periphery relationship with respect to the British Empire, it is worth noting that the British colonies comprised of huge numbers of individuals over whom the center had total control in terms of the apparatus of politics.

The British Empire at its peak spanned continents so that it could be hard to imagine how the imperial power managed to exercise the control. The European settler populaces together with their creole progenies formed the periphery in every area that the core dominated.

The settlers, however, dominated over the indigenous people and creoles in all the An analysis of the topic of the british empire they occupied, in terms of influence and power.

Such core regions formed the practicalities for the embellishment and expansion of creole cultures which intently pursued the Metropolitan European cultures. Centrality in this respect entails order of symbols, values as well as beliefs governing society.

The center adopts those ideological standpoints that would let it to utmost exploit the periphery, that is, to benefit from the association by incurring the least level of costs.

The authoritative elites of the British Empire presiding over the institutions enjoyed a certain dynamic relationship not only to the center, but also to the powerful order conferring legitimacy. Unvaryingly, on the other hand, the central value system legitimating the central institutional system was commonly shared Greene, In this relationship, authority was flowing outwardly from the center to the periphery.

The establishment of such structures was routinely via an adaptive trial and error progression early in the history of every colony.

The Norton Anthology of English Literature: The Victorian Age: Topic 4: Overview

This happened in a context of outstanding resilience, survival and unrelenting metropolitan efforts towards subordinating the peripheries to the central authority. For instance, the hands-on operational constitutional structure, in which the numerous polities of the America peripheries put forth measurable power advanced in parallel with time.

Besides, the settlers presiding over these political entities ensured the Federal Constitution was not the outcome of obligation to the periphery from the imperial constitution, which is considerably weak.

[BINGSNIPMIX-3

The peripheries rather opted for ostentatious negotiations with the center to honor their devotion to the center. Thus, the British Empire was a negotiated empire Greene, Scholastically, there is a number of perspectives which have transformed the center-peripheral relationship model of the British Empire.

The British were known as bent on exploiting of the natural resources of their colonies, for instance, they depended on cotton grown in the peripheries to make clothes in factories located in Britain. Secondly, the British Empire could be better viewed as an intersecting, coinciding web or network of persons and information flowing in circuits both between and across the metropolis and the peripheries Greene, The British Empire sent governors from Europe to take control over the operations in the periphery states.

People were an imperative element of this as witnessed by the waves of emigrants circulating between various locations as well as the officials and public servants whose careers took them form one placement to another.

An analysis of the topic of the british empire

The center-periphery relationship is not necessarily smoothened by the apparent closeness of the governors to the imperial power. However, despite the fact that the governors at the periphery enjoyed a privileged position with respect to official communication from the center, the same governors suffered breakdown of communication from the center.

Therefore, they were more vulnerable than they actually seemed to be. The governors were subjected to uncertainty such that they adopted desperate means like the career-enhancing tendency of naming cities or even rivers after themselves. As a result, the governors became reliant on friends sharing similar political persuasion, but unfortunately these friends were likely to personally represent their interests to the Colonial Office.

It is worth noting that being located at the center triggers a number of consequences. For example, the center is well universally known for being in possession of the most powerful institutions of governance. As a result, it gets to enjoy considerably greater financial and economic activity and this avails greater wealth.

Through this, it is the center which rules. The power and resource of the struggle existing between the center and the periphery exemplifies the situation Greene, Illustratively, Northern Ireland devolution has led to the enhancement of Belfast as the capital city, which is located within the periphery of the United Kingdom.

Further struggle for resources and wealth is experienced at the periphery level where there are competing sides. For instance, the presence of considerably sharp internal divisions between the Republicans and Unionists augments greater sophistications to the development of Belfast as well as Northern Ireland.Discuss why each area was important to American empire building (political, economic, and social).

Explain America’s expansionist ideals. This was the case for British colonialism in India. As imperialism spread, the colonizer and the colony viewed imperialism differently.

Complex discussion and critical analysis of the structures. - THE BRITISH EMPIRE The British Empire was the largest empire in history and for a time was the foremost global power.

It was a product of the European age of discovery, which began with the maritime explorations of the 15th century, that sparked the era of the European colonial empires.

Media Critical Analysis Analysis: How is the topic of the British Empire presented in this magazine article by the historian, Denis Judd?

Context: From September , Hellesdon High School in Norwich, England ran a series of new Introductory Skills workshops to incoming History AS-Level students. British Empire News - Check out the latest News on British Empire. Get breaking news updates on British Empire and published at Daily News & Analysis.

British strategists had also for many years believed that the best defense of Egypt and the Suez Canal was an attack on Turkey. Germany Robinson and Gallagher Compared with Cain and Hopkins. British strategists had also for many years believed that the best defense of Egypt and the Suez Canal was an attack on Turkey.

Germany Robinson and Gallagher Compared with Cain and Hopkins.

British Empire News, Latest Breaking News on British Empire | Daily News & Analysis